FORUM POST
Re: ApronymsPosted by Tony (Wh@isRelvant?) on 01 July 2003 10:25:03 UTC |
>>> On 01 July 2003 09:49:58 UTC, Angela wrote: >>> On 27 June 2003 14:18:53 UTC, Angela wrote: (apronym is currently a googlewhack apart from it not being in the dictionary) and we already have more than 6942 of them. I have just put 'apronym' into sherlock and got one hit from Lycos. Sherlock shaded the relevance scale only slghtly. 'Apronyms' got the same result. If the word one is looking for is on a site devoted to that word why would Sherlock list the relvance as less than 100%? |
| << | Reply | New Message | Message List | New Thread | Thread List | >> |